Saturday, January 15, 2011

Mencken: "The Penalty of Death"

Is Mencken arguing for or against capital punishment?

"The Penalty of Death" (1926)

by H.L. Mencken

Of the arguments against capital punishment that issue from uplifters, two are commonly heard most often, to wit:

1. That hanging a man (or frying him or gassing him) is a dreadful business, degrading to those who have to do it and revolting to those who have to witness it.

2. That it is useless, for it does not deter others from the same crime.

The first of these arguments, it seems to me, is plainly too weak to need serious refutation3. All it says, in brief, is that the work of the hangman is unpleasant. Granted. But suppose it is? It may be quite necessary to society for all that. There are, indeed, many other jobs that are unpleasant, and yet no one thinks of abolishing them--that of the plumber, that of the soldier, that of the garbage-man, that of the priest hearing confessions, that of the sand-hog, and so on. Moreover, what evidence is there that any actual hangman complains of his work? I have heard none. On the contrary, I have known many who delighted in their ancient art, and practiced it proudly.

In the second argument of the abolitionists there is rather more force, but even here, I believe, the ground under them is shaky. Their fundamental error consists in assuming that the whole aim of punishing criminals is to deter other (potential) criminals--that we hang or electrocute A simply in order to so alarm B that he will not kill C. This, I believe, is an assumption which confuses a part with the whole. Deterrence, obviously, is one of the aims of punishment, but it is surely not the only one. On the contrary, there are at least half a dozen, and some are probably quite as important. At least one of them, practically considered, is more important. Commonly, it is described as revenge, but revenge is really not the word for it. I borrow a better term from the late Aristotle: katharsis. Katharsis, so used, means a salubrious discharge of emotions, a healthy letting off of steam. A school-boy, disliking his teacher, deposits a tack upon the pedagogical chair; the teacher jumps and the boy laughs. This is katharsis. What I contend is that one of the prime objects of all judicial punishments is to afford the same grateful relief (a) to the immediate victims of the criminal punished, and (b) to the general body of moral and timorous men.

These persons, and particularly the first group, are concerned only indirectly with deterring other criminals. The thing they crave primarily is the satisfaction of seeing the criminal actually before them suffer as he made them suffer. What they want is the peace of mind that goes with the feeling that accounts are squared. Until they get that satisfaction they are in a state of emotional tension, and hence unhappy. The instant they get it they are comfortable. I do not argue that this yearning is noble; I simply argue that it is almost universal among human beings. In the face of injuries that are unimportant and can be borne without damage it may yield to higher impulses; that is to say, it may yield to what is called Christian charity. But when the injury is serious Christianity is adjourned, and even saints reach for their sidearms. It is plainly asking too much of human nature to expect it to conquer so natural an impulse. A keeps a store and has a bookkeeper, B. B steals $700, employs it in playing at dice or bingo, and is cleaned out. What is A to do? Let B go? If he does so he will be unable to sleep at night. The sense of injury, of injustice, of frustration will haunt him like pruritus. So he turns B over to the police, and they hustle B to prison. Thereafter A can sleep. More, he has pleasant dreams. He pictures B chained to the wall of a dungeon a hundred feet underground, devoured by rats and scorpions. It is so agreeable that it makes him forget his $700. He has got his katharsis.

The same thing precisely takes place on a larger scale when there is a crime which destroys a whole community’s sense of security. Every law-abiding citizen feels menaced and frustrated until the criminals have been struck down--until the communal capacity to get even with them, and more than even, has been dramatically demonstrated. Here, manifestly, the business of deterring others is no more than an afterthought. The main thing is to destroy the concrete scoundrels whose act has alarmed everyone, and thus made everyone unhappy. Until they are brought to book that unhappiness continues; when the law has been executed upon them there is a sigh of relief. In other words, there is katharsis.

I know of no public demand for the death penalty for ordinary crimes, even for ordinary homicides. Its infliction would shock all men of normal decency of feeling. But for crimes involving the deliberate and inexcusable taking of human life, by men openly defiant of all civilized order--for such crimes it seems, to nine men out of ten, a just and proper punishment. Any lesser penalty leaves them feeling that the criminal has got the better of society--that he is free to add insult to injury by laughing. That feeling can be dissipated only by a recourse to katharsis, the invention of the aforesaid Aristotle. It is more effectively and economically achieved, as human nature now is, by wafting the criminal to realms of bliss.

The real objection to capital punishment doesn’t lie against the actual extermination of the condemned, but against our brutal American habit of putting it off so long. After all, every one of us must die soon or late, and a murderer, it must be assumed, is one who makes that sad fact the cornerstone of his metaphysic. But it is one thing to die, and quite another thing to lie for long months and even years under the shadow of death. No sane man would choose such a finish. All of us, despite the Prayer Book, long for a swift and unexpected end. Unhappily, a murderer, under the irrational American system, is tortured for what, to him, must seem a whole series of eternities. For months on end he sits in prison while his lawyers carry on their idiotic buffoonery with writs, injunctions, mandamuses, and appeals. In order to get his money (or that of his friends) they have to feed him with hope. Now and then, by the imbecility of a judge or some trick of juridic science, they actually justify it. But let us say that, his money all gone, they finally throw up their hands. Their client is now ready for the rope or the chair. But he must still wait for months before it fetches him.

That wait, I believe, is horribly cruel. I have seen more than one man sitting in the death-house, and I don’t want to see any more. Worse, it is wholly useless. Why should he wait at all? Why not hang him the day after the last court dissipates his last hope? Why torture him as not even cannibals would torture their victims? The common answer is that he must have time to make his peace with God. But how long does that take? It may be accomplished, I believe, in two hours quite as comfortably as in two years. There are, indeed, no temporal limitations upon God. He could forgive a whole herd of murderers in a millionth of a second. More, it has been done.

"The Penalty of Death" was first published in Prejudices: Fifth Series by H.L. Mencken, 1926.

1 comment:

  1. In Today’s Economic Crisis, customers need Low Prices, customers need Wal-Mart.
    Customers are sometimes infatuated with shipping at Wal-Mart because of the therapeutic benefits that comes from the experience. What greater feeling exist, other than the peace of mind, knowing that you have just landed the lowest price for a desired item? The experience of snatching the sale is the best remedy for any melancholic state of mind. Certainly, shopping at Wal-Mart has the same psychological and physiological benefits that a person would receive from sex, exercise, vocations, or even a career promotion at a major corporation.
    Recently— CNN ran a broadcast about the sensations customers experienced after snatching a big sale. The reports reveal that shoppers who score an extravagant sale have the same thrill one has during an orgasm. Now we perhaps know why loyal Wal-Mart customers are so loyal and enjoy so much the conglomerate's “everyday low prices.”
    Further research by The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services shows that the number of sexual orgasm that is require weekly to promote good health is at least three times per-week. Ian Kerner wrote a column in The Huffington Post entitled “6 Health Benefits of Sex" in which he advocates people should have sex more often. Kerner affirms, “So forget about an apple a day. To feel healthier, look younger, and live longer. An orgasm or two a week may be an effective -- and certainly enjoyable – remedy.” In this case, loyal Wal-Mart customer should certainly shop more often.
    However, the benefits of shopping at Wal-Mart extend way beyond six. Shopping at Wal-Mart has the ability to inspire customers by bolstering their confidence -- giving them the feeling that they can achieve greatness. In addition, this grand experience helps bring warmth and happiness to their loyal hearts—customers who are harmlessly just looking to purchase goods not just at the best quality, but at the lowest pricing—customer who are only looking to ease the tedious process of shopping around for the lowest prices, or the cumbersome ordeal of going to more than one store to get multi-items.
    These are not people. They are just loyal Wal-Mart customers! Loyal Wal-Mart customers do not stop to think about the ripple effects their desire to purchase at the lowest prices has on the country's monetary cash flow, worker’s exploitation, unfair international trading, and child labor. Plus, the burdens of selling at the lowest prices have tremendous effect on other companies as well. One such effect is globalization. Due to the inabilities of companies to keep up with the imperialist Wal-Mart, they resort to cheap labor, which is a side effect of the disease knows has outsourcing.
    Often times than not, due to outsourcing, companies have to transfer their entire business of operation to other countries in order to compete with Wal-Mart’s market power. Outsourcing causes job losses in the U.S.; at a time when Wal-Mart controls the marketplace. But do loyal Wal-Mart customers care? No! People care, loyal Wal-Mart customers are just looking for an orgasmic experience. They are just shopping themselves out of jobs.